

This is my preliminary (prem) tasks compared to my final product. As you can see these two magazines have been produced for different reasons. The one on the left is for a school magazine and the other is aimed to fit in the music magazine genre. Therefore some of the techniques used are different in order for it to be suitable for its aim.
Looking back at my prem I didn't really understand or looked at using different technology and editing softwares in order to produce my product, therefore I don't think I produced my best possible version. Also I only produced one draft and so I did look and analysis where about I could have improved.
Firstly I should have spent more time in researching what are the typical conventions of a school magazine. When it came to my music magazine I spent a long time researching lots of different genres of music magazines in order for me to gain ideas and inspirations and to essentially see what type of magazine I wanted to produce. I felt like a rushed things on my prem compared to my music mag. With my music mag I spent a lot longer trying to prefect the outcome and making sure it was the best it could possibly be. For my prem I did try to but now looking back I wasn't equipped with enough information to do so, to be able to see where I needed to change things.
Also when looking back I felt that asking for feedback from you peers and doing focus groups was vital in achieving a good replica of a music magazine. There opinions meant a lot, in the sense that it helped me to figure what needed to change in order to satisfy the customer. Without the common feedback I don't think my magazine that I produced would have been very good as their views guided me into making sure that my magazine was following the typical conventions but also what they liked and made my magazine stand out to the others. However in my prem I didn't really see seeking other opinions as a priority as I just wanted to produce a final product. I feel that if I had asked I would have ended up with a better result that would have engaged my readers.
When it came to editing both of the products, the main website I used was pixlr. I felt that when it came to my music magazine I had a lot more experience in the website and therefore knew how to use it which saved time in the production stage so that I had more time to basically worry about other problems. However I used much more complex and editing skills in my music mag as in the school magazine the front cover as you can see only has basic text and two pictures to overlay the main. But in my music mag I had explored and experimented with using different lighting effects by making it brighter and softer. Also I have thought about different techniques like a colour scheme in my final cover where it is white and purple. In my school cover I didn't think about how I was going to engage my target audience in the sense of colour schemes, the model and cover lines. Looking back I realised how I didn't take all the details into account and just produced a magazine cover and contents.
When it came to choosing my cover lines they are very different in both versions of the magazines. In the school magazine I had to base it around the school and what was important and interesting to mention on the front cover. Also the sell lines had to have a more positive outlook on them like "winner of eco school" as it had to set the school in a good way and support it. It had to essentially promote the school and make students want to join there. However for the music magazine I could present a variety of positive and negative cover lines as I my magazines purpose wasn't to promote my company it was to share opinions and findings on the music industry so I stated things like "top 10 albums" that had nothing to do with my company yet readers would still want to buy the magazine.
Overall I felt that by producing my preliminary task it help set me up for the real project. I made me gain experience and confidence in using different types of websites and technologies and helped me to spend time on other problems rather than figuring out how to use the softwares. Also it helped me to realise how you can't just go straight into the production section of the magazine, you must first take time to research other professional works and how they have used or challenged typical conventions. This then lead into discovering and planning what I actually wanted to do with the magazine. I now understand the vigorous process that magazine industries must under take. I think the most important thing in the whole production is to make sure that you are getting readers feedback and advice as these people are buying your magazine and are who you want to impress.











